(click to enlarge)
Note 1: even the hypotheses that were not rejected (not significant difference) should also be analyzed. The analysis can be either or both of the following: (1) literature that support the lack of significance, and; (2) a characteristic or flaw in the study design that could have been the source of the lack of significance.
Note 2: there is no specific rule on the length of discussion for the analysis of each result. However, it is generally understood that the more comprehensive the discussion of analysis, the better.
No comments:
Post a Comment